The contract structure you choose decides how much budget certainty you get — and how much market movement you're exposed to.
There is no universally "best" structure — only the one that fits your risk tolerance and budget needs. Here is how the three common approaches compare.
A set price for the term. Maximum budget certainty, minimal upside if the market falls. Best for organizations that prize predictability.
Price moves with the market. More potential upside when prices fall, more exposure when they rise. Best for risk-tolerant buyers who can absorb swings.
A mix — for example, fixing a portion and floating the rest, sometimes with caps. Balances certainty and flexibility. Best for portfolios that want both.
We model each structure against your real load and tolerance, so the choice is deliberate and defensible — not a default.
Many commercial buyers favor fixed or blended for budget stability, but the right answer depends entirely on your goals.
Strategy is revisited at renewals and as conditions change — that's part of ongoing oversight.
Upload a utility bill and we'll turn ERCOT insight into a strategy for your organization.